Written by Matt Giles
Edited by Erin Accomando and Jason Umpleby
This will probably be the trickiest review I write
considering I have to be quite careful of venturing into spoiler territory.
Let’s start with this: there’s a cabin in the woods; five college students
arrive to party it up over the weekend; chaos ensues. Sounds familiar right?
Well, it is and it isn’t. The film, written by Joss Whedon and Drew Goddard,
directed by Goddard, tries to turn the conventions of a typical horror film on
it’s head (or does it) and give us something we’re not expecting. There’s the
jock, Curt (Chris Hemsworth), the ditzy blonde, Jules (Anna Hutchison), the
stoner, Marty (Fran Kranz), the scholar, Holden (Jesse Williams) and the
virgin, Dana (Kristen Connolly). Based on all of these character types, we can
guess who will die first (or can we?). At the same time, we’re shown two
technicians, Sitterson (Richard Jenkins) and Hadley (Bradley Whitford) who seem
to be setting the events with the cabin in motion. I’ve probably revealed more
than I should already.
I had been waiting for The
Cabin In The Woods to come out since January of 2010. I’m a fan (not a huge
fan, but a fan nonetheless) of Joss Whedon (and to all my fellow browncoats)
and was interested to see what he would do with a familiar horror story. I was
really looking forward to seeing how Drew Goddard would do from a directing
standpoint. I have been more of a fan of Goddard’s work (he’s floated through
many more of my favorite shows than Whedon) for the past few years and after
seeing Cloverfield, a film that he
wrote, I wanted to see what else he would do in the film world in addition to
his already impressive television work.
Cabin kind of
feels like a lackluster version of an already successful genre. Say what you
will about horror. Like any genre sometimes it works, most of the time it
doesn’t, but when it does, you remember it. For horror, in the last decade, I
don’t think any film has left me more emotionally scarred than The Ring. More recently, the Paranormal Activity Films worked,
scaring us in the simplest (but not cheapest) of ways. Every few years films
like those come along and really find a new way to scare us. Then for years
after that it’s done over and over again until something new comes our way. Why
am I going on and on about this? Because The
Cabin In The Woods promotes itself as being one of these films; something
that will change how we perceive horror. Let me be in the minority by saying
that this film does not succeed.
I was hoping that it would take an approach that, I guess,
explained why these types of characters exist in movies. They explain the
character types within the universe they create in the film, which when it’s
revealed what’s really going on I simply said, “seriously?” Maybe that approach
would work in another film, but I would argue that Whedon and Goddard should
have taken the Scream route and
acknowledged the fact that this stuff happens in almost every horror film. I
don’t think (don’t quote me) the words “film” or “movie” are mentioned once and
for a revisionist approach such as this one, they need to be.
Watching this film reminded me of better films in this
specific category of horror, The Evil
Dead, Friday The 13th,
and yes, as twisted as it is, Antichrist.
The Cabin In The Woods is basically
Whedon and Goddard’s attempt (yes, attempt) at putting their spin on horror.
There’s a degree of affection for the genre, which I appreciate, but it just
takes itself too seriously. It wants to point out elements of the genre that we
know about, but then tries to one-up those elements and kills its own impact in
the process.
I wanted to love this movie. I wanted to praise both Whedon
and Goddard. Whedon gets another chance with The Avengers in a few weeks. I guess I’ll have to wait a little
longer to see if Goddard has the directing chops to last in film.
No comments:
Post a Comment